Publishers
WordPress for publishers and newsrooms: infrastructure built around editorial workflow, not installed and left running.
Your publishing platform is the infrastructure your editorial team runs on. When it’s fragile, their work is fragile. I build systems designed around how your organization actually publishes — not around what was easiest to install.
$275/hr CAD development · $425/hr CAD advisory
The problem this fixes.
Most publishing teams have inherited a build that worked when it was set up and gradually became something nobody wants to touch. The content model is wrong for how the team actually works. The editorial workflow depends on one person. Updates are terrifying. The site slows down during traffic spikes. Accessibility requirements are coming from procurement and nobody knows how to address them.
That’s the state I walk into most often. The work is: stabilize the architecture, reduce the editorial friction, and leave behind a system the team can operate without calling me every month.
What this work changes.
The platform your editorial team can operate without calling a developer every week. The workflow that doesn’t collapse when your senior engineer leaves. The site that holds when a story breaks and traffic spikes.
For most organizations, the problem isn’t the content management system. It’s the architecture built on top of it. The content model that never matched how your desk actually works. The permissions setup that evolved through two rebuilds and nobody quite understands anymore. Those are fixable. The output is a publishing system that’s boring in the right way: reliable, documented, and not dependent on any one person to keep running.
What I build.
Editorial CMS architecture
Custom post types, content models, and block patterns built around how your team actually creates content, not WordPress defaults. Includes role design, capability mapping, and editor-facing documentation your staff can use without a developer on call.
Multi-author publishing workflows
Contributor permissions, editorial approval flows, scheduling systems, and the post-type architecture that makes a multi-author operation manageable. Built for teams of five to fifty.
Publishing platform migrations
Newsroom migrations, WordPress VIP delivery, and platform consolidations. Content archaeology when you need historical posts preserved and properly mapped. I’ve delivered eight Postmedia titles at this scale. I know what breaks.
Technical SEO for editorial teams
Core Web Vitals, internal linking systems, structured data, and indexation architecture tuned for publishing schedules, not for a static brochure site. Written deliverables your team can hand to a developer or act on directly.
Accessibility and compliance
WCAG 2.2 AA implementation and AODA compliance for Canadian publishers and government communications teams. Procurement-ready documentation, remediation plans, and the implementation work, not just the report.
AI-augmented editorial workflows
For teams already using AI tools without governance: routing layer, agent personas for editorial roles, cost attribution, and the audit trail that legal and finance can actually read. Available as an add-on to any publishing infrastructure engagement.
Who this is for.
Editorial directors, digital leads, and senior editors at organizations publishing regularly: newsrooms, association publishers, government communications teams, academic publishers. If you have five or more contributors and the workflow is held together by conventions nobody wrote down, this is the right starting point.
If you’re migrating from a platform that’s getting too expensive or too fragile, preparing for AODA accessibility requirements, or trying to consolidate several properties into a single publishing operation, the scope is clear: what exists, what needs to work, and what it costs to get there.
If you’re a solo writer or a small business with a blog, the local business service is a better fit. This work starts at the infrastructure layer, not the content layer. If the platform includes a training or LMS layer alongside the publishing system, the learning infrastructure service covers that side of the build. For national brands with a corporate editorial operation, the brands service covers enterprise WordPress builds and technical stewardship.
How engagements work.
Most engagements start with a discovery call, an hour to understand what you have, what your team actually needs to operate it, and what’s been getting in the way. No questionnaire in advance. No sales deck. Just a conversation to find out whether the work is the right scope for what we’re trying to fix.
If you don’t know your current state, a site audit is the right first move. It maps what’s broken, what to fix first, and what implementation will cost. The audit fee is credited in full against publishing infrastructure work if you proceed within 90 days.
From there, the engagement is scoped as a fixed-price brief: deliverables defined, timeline set, no open-ended retainer that expands when the scope isn’t pinned down. The work is documented as it progresses so your team isn’t dependent on any one person to understand what was built and why.
Handoff includes working documentation, enough that your senior editor or IT contact can operate the platform without calling a developer for routine things. After delivery, most publishing operations move to a Concierge maintenance plan, scheduled around the publishing calendar, with a committed response time for production issues. If the work surfaces something that changes the scope, that’s a conversation before it changes the price.
Rates.
Publishing infrastructure work is billed at $275/hr CAD for senior development and $425/hr CAD for advisory and architecture: the same rate for every client. All project work is quoted as a flat rate after the discovery call. You’ll know the full number before you commit.
Every engagement starts with a free 20-minute discovery call. The call figures out what’s actually wrong and whether I’m the right person to fix it.
Questions.
- How long does a typical publishers engagement take?
It depends on scope. A platform audit with a remediation brief typically takes two to four weeks. A full editorial CMS rebuild or workflow overhaul is usually eight to fourteen weeks. The scope is defined in the discovery call and fixed before the engagement starts — the timeline doesn’t extend unless the scope changes.
- Do you work with newsrooms that are already on WordPress?
Yes. Most of this work is on existing WordPress installs — audits of what’s broken, migrations away from page builders or legacy themes, editorial workflow fixes, and accessibility remediations. Starting from scratch is less common than fixing what’s already there.
- What does fixed-price mean for this kind of work?
The deliverables and price are agreed before the engagement starts. If something comes up during the work that changes the scope, that’s a conversation before it changes the bill, not after.
- What’s the difference between this and hiring an agency?
Direct access to the senior engineer doing the work. No account manager between you and the person making decisions. The work is documented so your team can understand what was built and why — not a black box you’re dependent on to maintain.
Working with a newsroom or editorial team that needs to modernize its stack?
The Postmedia WordPress migration put 13 newspaper properties on a shared infrastructure — unified editorial workflow, consistent performance, and a system the internal team could own. That’s the template for this kind of work.
Publishers and newsrooms I’ve built for.
Ready to build publishing infrastructure that holds?
Discovery calls are 20 minutes. You bring the editorial constraints; I bring the architecture options. No proposal theatre — a direct conversation about what your stack actually needs.
Book a 20-minute discovery callProduct names referenced on this page, including WordPress and GitHub, are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Training offered here is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any of these companies.